UWM Chemistry NMR facility
bar.gif

UWM Logo
Great Lakes Freshwater Center Logo

Determination of the three dimensional Structure and HN--S Hydrogen Bonding of the Synthetic 113Cd3bN domain of Lobster MT-1 by NMR

Amalia Muñoz#, F. Holger Försterling, C. Frank Shaw III+ and David Petering


Department of Chemistry and UWM-NIEHS Marine and Freshwater Biomedical Core Center, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee WI 53211

# Current address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
+ Current address: Department of Chemistry, Eastern Kentucky, Richmond KY-40475

bar.gif
bar.gif

Abstract

Metallothionein (MT) is a cysteine-rich metal-binding protein. MT clusters of different origins, exhibiting a range of highly conserved cysteine positions in their sequences, show differences in metal-cysteine connectivities and reactivity. Lobster-MT, which includes two Cd3S9 ß-domains, was chosen as a basic model to study the structure-function relationship among clusters. Here NMR studies concerning the ßN domain will be presented. The metal clusters were defined from the 2D 1H/113Cd HSQC-TOCSY experiments and found to exhibit the same metal-cysteine coordination as in the native holo-Cd6-MT from lobster and crab.  The 1H/113Cd HSQC-TOCSY experiment allowed us, from the amide proton region, to easily identify the bridging and terminal cysteines coordinated to each cadmium. Proton resonances were assigned using two dimensional methods; the structure calculation was performed using 271 proton-proton distance restraints from NOE data, and 37 restraints for the f and Cys-c1 dihedral angles derived from 3JHNHa and 3JHa/Hb. In addition 6 restraints for the Cys-Cd c2 angle derived from heteronuclear 1H/113Cd couplings were included. Four possible HN-S hydrogen bonds were defined using heteronuclear spin echo difference experiments, the strongest of which was found to involve Glu-10. The NMR results also indicated the presence of a second minor conformation with different metal environment as shown by the differences in the 113Cd- and 1H-NMR chemical shifts. The structure and implications of the hydrogen bonding pattern for sequence preservation and possibly in the conformational changes will be discussed. The results shown here indicate than the ßN-domain has a more labile structure than the ßC. These differences can be related to the differences in reactivity observed between these two Cd3ß domains toward EDTA and DTNB (5,5'-dithio-bis-(2nitrobenzoic acid)). Therefore, this work shows the correlation between cluster structure and reactivity among the ß-domains in metallothioneins.
bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Introduction

Metallothionein (MT) is characterized by its high content in cysteine residues (30%) and lacking aromatic amino acid and histidines. Metallothionein also lacks disulfide bonds, thus is capable of bind a large number or metal ions (7 in the case of mammalian MT). The first function attributed to MT was metal detoxification (Hg2+, Cd2+ ), then roles as metallo-regulator of Zn2+ and Cu+ followed as well as the detoxification of reactive oxygen species and metabolism of metallodrugs and alkylating agents.
Human and mammalian MTs bind 7 Zn2+ or Cd2+ ions via 20 cysteine residues, which are distributed in two independent and kinetically and thermodynamic ally different clusters, Cd4S11 and Cd3S9, located at the a- and bbeta;-domains of the protein, respectively. Crustacean MTs contain only 18 cysteines and 6 Cd2+, which generate two Cdi3S9 clusters. Previous structural studies carried out in both species by 2D-NMR techniques show that the Cd-cysteine coordination and therefore the folding differs among these Cdi3S9 clusters in the bbeta;-domains of crustacean and mammalian MTs. [1,2] Previous studies showed that the reaction of lobster MT with thiol reagents such as DTNB (5,5'-dithio-2,2'dinitro benzoic acid) or DTP (dithiopyridine) were also biphasic but more rapid than in the case of the mammalian MT reactions. Thus, the difference in cluster structure as reason for the biphasic kinetic was ruled out. And , it was proposed then, that the kinetic and thermodynamic reactivity of the MT domains is related to the detailed folding of the peptides around their clusters.
To analyze structure-function relationships among these domains, in this poster we describe the 3D-structure of the chemically synthesized native lobster bbeta; N (Figure 1) as determined by 2D-NMR spectroscopy.


bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Assignment and Secondary Structure:


Synthetic Cd3MT- bN exhibits 113Cd chemical shifts resembling cadmium ions in a tetrahedral environment, coordinated by terminal and bridging cysteines. These shifts exhibit initially a time dependence, with the shifts approaching, but not completely reaching the shifts of the complete holo protein (Figure 2). This is indicative of conformational rearrangement occurring. A stable structure obtained after three months was used for the structure calculations below.

Assignment of most proton resonances was obtained for the synthetic MT-bN using 2D TOCSY and NOESY experiments. The Cd-cysteine connectivities of the Cd3S3i cluster were obtained from heteronuclear 2D- 1H{113Cd}HSQC-TOCSY experiments (Figure 3A). The results indicate that the synthetic Cd3bN exhibits the same metal-coordination as the native holo protein (Figure 5).

Figure 3: The HN region of the 2D 1H{113Cd} HSQC-TOCSY spectrum (T=298K) shows correlations due to Sg-Cd bonds involving the respective Cys residue and allows one to establish Cd-S cluster connectivities.



A total of 254 NOE's were obtained from 2D NOESY spectra obtained at 278K with mixing times of 60ms and 150ms. Measurement of the coupling constants 3JHNHa , 3JHaHb and 3JHbCd yielded 13 additional dihedral angle restraints restraints for the backbone angle f, 10 for the side chain dihedral angle c1 and 6 for the CaCbbeta;SCd dihedral angle, c2.
Analysis of the sequential to medium range NOE's and of 3JHNHa coupling constants indicated the absence of elements of secondary structure as expected for MT (Figure 4). In addition, small and large values of the temperature coefficient of the HN chemical shift are also shown.


Figure 4: Summary of sequential and medium range NOE's, 3JHNHa and temperature coefficients of d HN for Cd3-bbeta; N. NOE's are classified as strong, medium, weak and very weak indicated by different heights of the connecting box. Large Temperature coefficients (< -5 ppb K-1) indicating solvent exposed protons are drawn in red, whereas values around 0 ppb K-1 indicating slow exchange are colored in green. A series of fast exchanging protons in the range of C16-G19 indicates increased flexibility of that loop.


bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Hydrogen Bonding


While temperature dependence of the amide protons (Dd > -5 ppb K-1provides an indication of possible hydrogen bonds, scalar spin-spin couplings 2hJHNCd, normally in the order of 0.5-2.0 Hz [5] and not observed in standard experiments, can provide direct evidence of a  NH--S hydrogen bond.  In the case of the synthetic Cd3-MT-bN, a two dimensional 1H{113Cd}-HMQC experiment optimized for small couplings and with decoupling of 3JNHaduring the indirect detection period (Figure 6B) was used to obtain qualitative through hydrogen bond connectivity information between the HN and Cd atoms (Figure 6C).  Additionally, the magnitude of2hJHNCd was obtained from a one dimensional 1H{113Cd}HSED experiment [5] (Figure 6A).   This is not the first observation of a NH--S hydrogen bond by NMR, but it is the first example of a 2D HN-Cd correlation through a hydrogen bond and the first example of an experimentally established hydrogen bond for a metallothionein in solution.

Figure 5: (A)Pulse sequence for 1D 1H{113Cd} HSED experiment and (B) 2D long range1HN{113Cd} HMQC  employing a jump and return pulse pair for selective decoupling of 3JHNHaduring t1 and water suppression.
f1 = x,y,-x,-y; f2 = -x, -y, x, y; f3 = 4 (-x), 4 x f3' = 4 (-x) y = 2 (x, -x), 2 (-x, x)
D = 1 / [2 (dHN-dH2O)] (208 ms) t = 1 / (2hJHN-Cd) (62 ms)
(C) Long range optimized 1HN{113Cd}-HMQC exhibits cross peaks  indicative of either 2hJHN--Cd couplings (S24, C22, E10) or long range intra residual  5JHNCd couplings (C5).  In addition, a cross peak involving a minor conformational isomer is observed, presumably due to a hydrogen bond interaction.  Coupling constants obtained by a 1D HSED experiment are given in parentheses.


bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Structure Calculation

Structure calculations were carried out with the program XPLOR [3] employing an ab initio simulated annealing protocol. A subset of 300 structures was generated, and the 30 structures of lowest energy were selected for the final analysis. Superposition of those 30 structures yielded a total rmsd of 0.52 A for the backbone, metal cluster and cysteine-Cb atoms of the non terminal residues (residue 4-27), (1.24 A for all non terminal heavy atoms). For each of the two conformational isomers, the rmsd values of the non terminal backbone and metal cluster atoms were 0.26 and 0.12 A, respectively.

Figure 6: Ribbon display of the synthetic MT-bbeta;N.   The Cd -S cluster and Cys- side chain are shown as ball and sticks.  The numbering of the Cd atoms ia the same as in the holo protein of lobster-MT.  Experimentally established HN--S hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines with donor residues indicated.  
This figure was prepared using the program MOLMOL2k.1 by Koradi et al. [4]

Click on the picture to view it full size


bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Discussion of Structure

A ribbon representation of the minimized average structure is shown in Figure 6. The Cd-S cluster and the Cys side chains are also shown.  The Cd-S cluster exhibits a boat conformation as it is typically observed for b domains of MT.  The superposition of the 30 structures of lowest energy (Figure 7) exhibits the presence of two  conformations in the loop between Ala12 ans Gly19.  Many residues in that area also exhibit rapid amide proton exchange (Figure 4). This is also represented by the backbone dihedral angles f and y which exhibit  two ranges for residues 14, 15 and 17.  

Figure 7: Overlay of the 30 structures of lowest energy of Lobster MT-bN and compared with the mean structure of the N-terminal domain of Crab-MT [1].

Figure 8: Backbone dihedral angles (f and y) for the 30 stuctures of lowest energy of lobster Cd3- bN.  The two conformations are indicated ( o and o).  For comparison, the values for Crab-MT are also shown (o).  


bar.gif
To Top of This Page
bar.gif

Comparison with Crab MT

 In a comparison with Crab-MT it is noticeable that the HN chemical shifts  of Cys5 and E10 differ significantly for lobster-MT when compared to Crab-MT (Figure 9). Since the difference is common to both the isolated domain Cd3-bN and the holo protein of lobster-MT, it has to be related to a structural change related to a change in the sequence.  It is interesting to note that in the case of Cd3- b N a strong ross peak due to a NH--S hydrogen bond is observed between those two residues.  Furthermore, E10 is substituted by V10 in the case of Crab-MT, giving rise to the speculation that the nature of residue 10 influences the strength of the hydrogen bond (E10)NH--Sg(C5)  observed in MT-bN.  Indeed a closer inspection of the two structures indicated the possibility of a hydrogen bond (G15)NH--O(V10) in the case of Crab-MT which is not possible if V10 is substituted by E10 in the case of lobster-MT.  An overlay of the backbone and Cd-S clusters of Lobster-bN and Crab-MT is shown in Figure 10.  With the general fold of the two backbones quite similar, there are nevertheless distinct differences in the cluster

Figure 9:  HN proton chemical shift difference between the synthetic MT-bbeta;Ndomain and the holo proteins of Lobster and Crab.  Residues exhibiting major changes are indicated.  The change for C27 is unique for the i isolated bbeta;N domain, whereas the difference for C5 and E10 is due to a difference in sequence between lobster and crab-MT.


Figure 10: Overlay of the backbone of Lobster-bN and Crab-MT[1]

.

bar.gif

Literature:


[1] Narula, S. S; Brouwer, M.; Hua, Y.; Armitage, I. M.; Biochemistry1995, 34, 620-631.
[2] Zhu, Z.; DeRose, E. F.; Mullen, G. P.; Petering, D. H.; Shaw, C. F. III; Biochemistry   1994, 33, 8858-8865.
[3] Brünger, A. T.; "X-PLOR: A system for X-Ray Crystollagraphy and NMR" , Yale  University   Press, New Haven, CT, 1992.
[4] Koradi, R.; Billeter, M; Wüthrich, K.; J. Mol. Graph. 1996, 14, 51-55.
[5] Blarke, P. R.; Lee, B.; Summers, M. F.; Adams, M. W. W.; Park, J. B.; Zhou, Z. H.;  Bax, A.; J.  Biomol. NMR 1992, 2, 527-533.

bar.gif
To Top of This Page NMR Home back to NMR lab on line posters To Poster-On-Line
bar.gif
This page was created by F. Holger Försterling on May 11 2000
Last update [an error occurred while processing this directive]